Yes, 2011 gave us two nearly identical “friends with benefits” movies. This one is than the Natalie Portman/Ashton Kutcher version. Friends with Benefits is funnier, sexier, and more honest about the emotional messiness of casual sex. It also has much stronger dialogue and chemistry.
. Maya was laughing at Emma Stone’s snappy dialogue, her head resting on Jamie’s shoulder, when he didn't just see his best friend—illegally charming and familiar—he saw the person he didn't want to spend a single Tuesday without. The "benefits" were easy; it was the "friends" part that became complicated. Jamie realized that while you can contractually agree not to fall in love, you can’t exactly tell your heart to stick to the fine print. When the movie ended, the silence in the room felt heavy with everything they hadn't written on that napkin. Jamie looked at her, the playful banter dying in his throat, realizing that the biggest risk wasn't losing the arrangement—it was losing the girl who had been his world long before the rules existed. Would you like to friends with benefits emma stone
Here is a solid guide to both, so you can find exactly what you are looking for. Yes, 2011 gave us two nearly identical “friends
Olive Penderghast (Stone) lies to her best friend about losing her virginity to a college guy. The rumor mill spirals out of control, and suddenly Olive finds herself the school "skank." Rather than cowering, she embraces the rumors, using her new reputation to help socially invisible guys by pretending to have sex with them (a "fake" friends-with-benefits arrangement) in exchange for gift cards and social clout. It also has much stronger dialogue and chemistry